For years, “test-optional” sounded like a simple instruction: take the SAT or ACT if a student wants to, and skip it if the score is not perfect. That interpretation is no longer reliable.
Some colleges have restored testing requirements. Others remain test-optional, test-flexible, test-preferred, or test-free. In addition, a score that is optional for admission may still influence scholarships, academic placement, or how an application is understood in context.
For the 2026–2027 application cycle, the important question is not whether standardized testing matters everywhere. It is whether a specific score strengthens a specific application at a specific college.
That is why families need a college-by-college testing strategy, not a universal rule. Admittedly’s personalized college admissions strategy can help students connect testing decisions to their academic profile, college list, application timeline, and broader goals.
The “Test-Optional” Era Is Not One Policy
The current landscape is divided. The College Board’s current list of colleges that require SAT or ACT scores identifies private and public institutions that currently or soon will require test scores for admission. The page also warns that testing policies change frequently and should be verified on each college’s admissions website.
At the same time, many colleges continue to allow applicants to apply without SAT or ACT scores. Therefore, a student cannot make a sound decision based only on a college’s reputation or on advice from a previous admissions cycle.
The Common App 2026–2027 requirements grid, updated September 18, 2026, shows how much policies vary across member institutions. Some colleges list a minimum standard test requirement. Others accept scores but do not require them, while still others direct applicants to review the college’s website for the current policy.
Four Testing Policies Applicants Should Distinguish
| Policy | What it generally means | What applicants should do |
| Test-required | SAT, ACT, or an approved alternative is required for the application to be complete. | Schedule the required exam early and verify deadlines, score-reporting rules, and accepted alternatives. |
| Test-optional | Applicants may apply without submitting SAT or ACT scores. | Determine whether a score strengthens the application in context before deciding not to report it. |
| Test-preferred | Scores may not be required, but the college indicates that submitting them can be beneficial. | Read the institution’s policy carefully and compare the score with the college’s reported range. |
| Test-free or score-free | The institution does not consider SAT or ACT scores in its admissions decision, or does not accept them for that purpose. | Do not send scores unless the college specifically identifies another use, such as placement. |
These categories are useful starting points, but they are not substitutes for reading the current policy of every college on a student’s list.
Why Are SAT and ACT Requirements Returning at Some Colleges?
The recent change is not simply a rejection of test-optional admissions. Colleges have offered several reasons for restoring testing requirements, including academic preparation, context, equity, prediction, and the need to evaluate applicants consistently across different high schools and grading systems.
Dartmouth, for example, explains that standardized testing is considered alongside the secondary school report, recommendations, and other parts of the application. The institution describes testing as one contextual factor rather than the primary factor in holistic admissions. Dartmouth reactivated its testing requirement beginning with applicants to the Class of 2029.
Brown states that it returned to requiring either SAT or ACT scores for first-year applicants beginning with the 2024–2025 admission cycle. The university also says that it superscores the SAT, the ACT, or both, and that test results remain one factor among many in its whole-person review.
MIT requires the SAT or ACT for both prospective first-year and transfer students. MIT also explains that applicants self-report scores during the application process and that the university verifies them upon enrollment.
These examples show why the phrase “colleges are bringing testing back” needs precision. The change is real at several influential institutions, but it is not universal. Testing policy remains institution-specific.
The Latest Common App Data Shows a More Complicated Shift
The Common App End-of-Season Report for 2024–2025 offers useful evidence about applicant behavior.
The report found that:
•The share of Common App member institutions requiring a test score rose from 4% in 2023–2024 to 5% in 2024–2025.
•The number of applicants reporting test scores increased by 12%.
•The number of applicants not reporting test scores declined by less than 1%.
•Applicants from several groups were more likely to apply without scores, although score reporting increased within each group.
These numbers do not mean that test-optional admissions has disappeared. Instead, they show that the testing environment is becoming more complicated. More applicants are choosing to report scores, even while many colleges still allow applicants to apply without them.
Consequently, students should not assume that either submitting or withholding a score is automatically the stronger choice.
When Should a Student Submit a Test Score?
At a test-optional college, submitting a score may make sense when the result adds useful evidence to the application. The score does not need to be perfect. It needs to be reasonably strong in relation to the college, the student’s academic record, and the rest of the application.
A student should consider submitting a score when:
•the score falls within or above the college’s recently reported middle range;
•the result supports the academic preparation shown by the transcript;
•the score helps clarify readiness for a quantitative, technical, or language-intensive program;
•the college uses scores in scholarship or placement decisions;
•the applicant attends a school with limited grading or course-context information; or
•the score adds context that the transcript alone does not provide.
By contrast, withholding a score may be reasonable when it is significantly below the college’s typical range and does not add meaningful context. However, that decision should be made after reviewing the institution’s policy, not simply by comparing the result with a national average.
A student with a lower score may still be a strong applicant. Likewise, a high score cannot compensate for weak coursework, inconsistent grades, or an application that lacks depth. Testing is evidence, not identity.
A Strong Score Is Contextual, Not Universal
There is no single SAT or ACT score that guarantees admission or automatically strengthens every application. A score should be evaluated in relation to several factors:
1. The College’s Published Profile
Applicants should review the most recent testing information published by the college. The middle 50% range can provide context, although it does not represent a cutoff or a guarantee.
2. The Student’s Transcript
A score should be compared with the student’s grades, course rigor, academic trends, and subject preparation. A strong math score may be especially relevant for an engineering applicant, while a verbal score may provide helpful context for a student applying to a writing-intensive program.
3. The Application’s Overall Positioning
A testing decision should fit the larger application. Students should not submit a score simply because it is available, and they should not withhold a score simply because a social media post says that test-optional applicants are disadvantaged.
4. Financial Aid and Scholarships
Some institutions use SAT or ACT scores when awarding merit scholarships, even when scores are not required for admission. Therefore, families should review scholarship policies separately from admissions policies.
The National Association for College Admission Counseling’s overview of test-optional admissions is useful for understanding why test-optional policies can affect applicants differently. Access to preparation, testing fees, school resources, and advising can influence who submits scores and how those scores should be interpreted.
SAT or ACT: Which Test Should a Student Take?
Most colleges that require standardized testing accept either the SAT or the ACT. The stronger choice is usually the exam that matches the student’s skills, pacing, preparation style, and available testing dates.
A practical approach is to complete a diagnostic assessment for both exams. Students can then compare:
•performance by section;
•pacing and time pressure;
•comfort with the question formats;
•performance after a short period of preparation; and
•access to reliable preparation resources.
Students should not take both exams repeatedly without a reason. A focused plan for one exam is often more productive than dividing preparation indefinitely.
Institutional policies can also differ. Dartmouth states that it has no preference between the SAT and ACT and automatically superscores multiple administrations. Brown superscores either exam or both. MIT considers the highest scores achieved in each section and asks applicants to self-report full test sittings rather than creating a self-calculated composite.
The final decision should therefore combine student fit and college policy. There is no universal “better” test.
Superscoring, Score Choice, and Official Reports
Testing language can create unnecessary confusion. These terms do not mean the same thing.
Superscoring means that a college combines a student’s highest section scores from multiple test dates, when the institution’s policy allows it. Brown, Dartmouth, and MIT each describe their own approach to reviewing scores.
Score Choice refers to selecting which SAT test dates to send through College Board. The College Board Score Choice guidance explains that students may select scores in some circumstances, but college and scholarship policies can differ.
Self-reporting means entering scores directly into the application or applicant portal. Some colleges accept self-reported results during review and request official reports only after admission or enrollment. Others may require official scores by the application deadline.
For that reason, a student should create a simple record containing:
•every test date;
•section scores and composite scores;
•colleges that require official reports;
•colleges that accept self-reporting;
•scholarship deadlines; and
•any policy about reporting all test dates.
The ACT score-reporting guidance also explains that score delivery and superscoring rules depend on the institution. Small administrative mistakes can create avoidable delays, so the final checklist should be completed before submission.
What About International Applicants?
International applicants should examine testing policies with additional care. A college may require SAT or ACT scores, allow approved alternatives, or separately require an English-proficiency exam.
Dartmouth, for example, provides several testing pathways for students who attended high school outside the United States, including SAT or ACT scores, AP results, International Baccalaureate results, British A-Level results, or an equivalent standardized national exam. Those alternatives are not universal across colleges.
MIT separately lists English-proficiency exams for some non-native English speakers and explains that those exams serve a different purpose from the SAT or ACT. Therefore, international applicants should distinguish between:
•academic readiness testing;
•English-language proficiency testing; and
•country-specific or curriculum-specific examinations.
A student should never assume that an English-proficiency score replaces an SAT or ACT requirement unless the college explicitly says so.
A Practical Testing Timeline for the 2026–2027 Cycle
A testing strategy works best when it begins before application deadlines create pressure.
| Timing | Recommended action | Strategic purpose |
| Sophomore year | Review the testing landscape and complete low-pressure diagnostic work. | Identify skill gaps without treating an early score as an admissions prediction. |
| Summer before junior year | Choose a likely exam and establish a realistic preparation plan. | Create consistency before junior-year academic and extracurricular demands increase. |
| Fall of junior year | Take an initial SAT or ACT when preparation is sufficient. | Establish a baseline for future decisions and possible retesting. |
| Winter of junior year | Review the score in relation to the developing college list. | Determine whether additional preparation or another test date would be useful. |
| Spring of junior year | Retest if the expected improvement is realistic and the student’s schedule allows it. | Build a stronger score before senior-year applications and scholarship deadlines. |
| Summer before senior year | Verify every college’s current policy and scholarship requirements. | Avoid relying on outdated test-optional information. |
| Senior fall | Submit self-reported or official scores according to each institution’s instructions. | Keep application materials accurate and complete. |
| After submission | Monitor portals and update scores only when the college permits updates. | Prevent inconsistent reporting or unnecessary submissions. |
The exact timeline depends on the student’s academic preparation, testing access, intended colleges, and application plan. Families can use Admittedly’s college admissions consulting services to connect testing decisions with course selection, college-list development, scholarships, and the rest of the application.
Common Testing Mistakes to Avoid
Treating a Viral List as a Permanent Policy
Testing policies change. A list shared online may refer to a previous cycle, a particular applicant group, or a temporary policy. Applicants should use national summaries for orientation and then verify the policy on the official college website.
Assuming Test-Optional Means Test-Irrelevant
A score may affect scholarships, placement, or how academic preparation is interpreted. The admissions policy and the scholarship policy may not be identical.
Sending Every Score Without Reviewing the Rules
Some colleges superscore automatically. Others ask applicants to report all sittings or follow specific self-reporting procedures. The institution’s instructions should control the decision.
Choosing an Exam Based on Prestige
Neither SAT nor ACT is universally superior. The appropriate choice depends on the student’s performance, preparation, timeline, and college list.
Waiting Until Senior Fall to Learn the Requirements
A student who waits may lose access to a useful test date, miss a scholarship deadline, or discover that a required exam must be completed earlier than expected.
Allowing Testing to Replace Strategy
A strong score is helpful, but it cannot substitute for appropriate coursework, thoughtful activities, compelling writing, recommendations, and a balanced college list. Admittedly’s essay guide can help families understand how testing fits into the larger application rather than treating it as the entire application.
SAT and ACT Questions, Answered
No. Some colleges require SAT or ACT scores, while others remain test-optional, test-preferred, test-flexible, or test-free. Policies can also differ by applicant type, academic program, scholarship, or application cycle. The official admissions website of each college should be treated as the final authority.
A student should consider submitting scores when they add positive academic context, fall within a competitive range, or support scholarship and placement opportunities. Withholding a score may make sense when it does not strengthen the application. The decision should be based on the complete profile rather than on a universal percentage or online rule.
Neither test is automatically better. Most colleges that require standardized testing accept either exam. Students should compare diagnostic performance, pacing, preparation needs, testing dates, and the policies of their target colleges.
Some colleges allow self-reporting during application review and request official scores after admission or enrollment. Other institutions require official reports by a specific deadline. Applicants must follow each college’s instructions and should never assume that one reporting method applies everywhere.
The New Testing Reality
The return of SAT and ACT requirements at some colleges has not eliminated test-optional admissions. Instead, it has created a more demanding decision environment.
Students now need to know which colleges require scores, which colleges prefer them, which colleges ignore them, and which colleges use them for scholarships or placement. They also need to understand how a score fits with the transcript, course rigor, intended field, school context, and overall application narrative.
The strongest strategy is not to take the SAT or ACT simply because a college list appears online. It is not to avoid testing simply because a college uses the phrase “test-optional.” The strongest strategy is to gather accurate information, evaluate the student’s profile honestly, and make a separate decision for each institution.
Testing is one part of an application. The right score, submitted to the right college, at the right time, can add useful evidence. The wrong score, sent without understanding the policy, can create confusion. Context turns a test result into a strategy.
Ready to Build a Smarter Testing Strategy?
Testing decisions should support a student’s larger admissions plan. A family may need to evaluate course rigor, academic trends, intended majors, activities, financial goals, essays, and college fit at the same time.
Families can explore Admittedly’s college admissions strategy resources for additional guidance. For individualized support with testing decisions, college-list development, and application positioning, book a Free Strategy Call with Admittedly.